Customer reviews about Shure SM 86

Sl

love it

Stephen l. 25.02.2014

such a differnt sound to an sm58..... more air and warmth... I use it in full band situations and also on solo acoustic guitar gigs. On the solo gigs the warmth really comes through and with very few feedback problems. Also used it for recording vocals and acoustic guitar and it works great... very strong and well built.

1

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

K

Great mic

Kevthebass 01.03.2022

Wanted to try a cardioid mic to compare with our vocalist's current super cardioid SM58 Beta. Far superior clarity, no need to be "on the mic" so allows the vocalist more freedom to express their voice better. Cheaper than an SM58 Beta, so unless your band is really loud on stage, highly recommended.

1

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

J

Clear and true sound

Jenick 16.09.2022

It is my first vocal condenser microphone. Compared to the SM58 this one has a larger frequency range towards the higher frequencies while still retaining great resistance to feedback. It doesn't suffer too much from the proximity effect as its response is limited at lower frequencies. Handling noise is also minimal. There are more expensive and better microphones with larger diaphragms, but this one does its job well too.

2

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

A

Upgrade from SM58

ABScott 19.01.2019

I have nothing bad to say about this microphone, I upgraded from the SM58 as I felt I wasn't getting the warmth I wanted as I perform with only an acoustic guitar. This microphone gives a much fuller sound to your voice and has allowed me to fully immerse myself into the music without concerning myself with my sound.

1

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

G

Very good mic for live performance.

Gregor143 13.01.2020

We are a male accapela singing group and we are using these mics for recording our on stage performances. The recorded sound is very clear there is no problem with feedback, the mic is very solid build it has a nice mounting piece coming with it. The mic has a very warm and bright sound characteristic which is very nice for accapela singing.

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

G

Nice condenser work horse

Granatins 31.01.2023

Bought it for my wife, for doing small acoustic gigs as she sings with maybe guitar and some piano to really shine her vocals. And it does the job best of all hand held condensers i think. But as with any, this is a subjective matter, and for her voice, this is the best one i have heard.
The way capsule looks suspended seams not quite the best engineering i have seen, but i guess does the job.

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

A

Great mic. Absolutely satisfied.

Anonymous 15.01.2016

Do not hesitate choosing this condenser for loud environments.
Shure Sm86 does keep up tightly with my large diaphragm brother for recording, while having the plus of a slightly more live oriented frequency range,and the classic sturdy Shure anatomy for handling, (commonly associated with dynamic mics), essential if you employ mic technique (singers).
It will of course pick up environment sound more easily in comparison to a dyn. but nothing that you cannot adjust with using close mic tech and less amp only really needed if you demand an immaculate recording from your gigs. All this for obvious quality compensation, watch any SM58 comparison and see for yourself.

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

A

Better than beta87

Anonymous 07.05.2014

Fatter sound than beta87 but very similar. Equally clear on top but slightly more weight on bottom and middle frequencies. Much nicer than sm58. Grilles are expensive to replace compared with sm58, same as beta87. Best vocal mic I've found.

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

F

Surprisingly smooth and clear

F-UL 30.06.2024

This was bought as a kind of back-up microphone, but has served us better than we expected. Smooth and clear sound, keeps plosives mostly out of the mix, and has directivity enough to be used in noisy environments (in our case behind a drum kit). Punches above its weight. Recommended.

0

Report

Do you believe this rating to be inaccurate or unacceptable for some reason? Please give us the reason for your assessment in the following text box and – if possible – your e-mail address for further questions.

Shure SM 86

157 Customer ratings

You have to be logged in to rate products.

3 Reviews

Served with love!

Shure SM 86

157 Customer ratings

You have to be logged in to rate products.

3 Reviews