the t.bone SC 400

To give you a bit of an introduction, I've been working in broadcasting for 27 years. This is my first full-range, studio-use condenser microphone; though I've used some that weren't my own. I've owned and used dynamic microphones pretty much all my life. I've used some good and some bad; some dirt cheap, and some at the top of the price list for their purpose. The expensive ones weren't always the best, but at the same time, the cheap ones weren't always the best, either.

My voice has a very de-nasal bump right around 800Hz, and between the frequency response of those mics and the ability I (or whoever's engineering) have to EQ them with whatever they're plugged into, it can be very hard to make them sound like my unamplified voice does to the average ear. In fact, the microphone that I had plugged in to my chain before I received the SC 400 required TWO bands on my parametric EQ to be set to 800Hz and cranked WAY down.

I plugged in the t.bone SC 400 and reset my entire EQ to zero. I was prepared to test it out as long as it took to get it right.

It took thirty seconds.

All I need is one band at 800Hz turned down to about 25%, and this things sounds BEAUTIFUL. Crisp highs -- I actually had to back those down a little, too, but not by much -- perfect low end, not a single other thing adjusted to compensate. Never in my life has it been that simple. The SC 400 sounds very natural, it's very sensitive, and I have been thoroughly enjoying every moment with it.

I'm using it for home voiceover recording and, eventually, podcasting and radio. In fact, as I type this, I just moments ago ordered a mixer and audio interface right here at Thomann in preparation for that.

I don't have any "cons" to give you, but as many people seem to be buying this as an entry-level studio condenser (as I did) and likely need some help adjusting, let me give you a couple of notes:

Sensitivity is going to be the first thing you notice, because the SC 400 has plenty of it. If you're not familiar with how to read sensitivity figures for microphones, I'll just give you the basic idea: where you see "dB re 1V/PA," the higher the number in that spec, the more sensitive the microphone is. The SC 400 is rated at -32.6 dB in that category. One of my other microphones, the Audio-Technica PRO 61 (a dynamic), is rated at -55 dB in that category. If I switch back and forth between the two, my preamp will have to be significantly adjusted to compensate.

The SC 400 is a hypercardioid microphone, meaning the most sensitive, accurate-sounding area around it is dead-center, right in front of the diaphragm. If you move around your microphone a lot, you're going to find yourself off-axis and sounding distant rather often. This mic is generally intended for studio situations where you or your talent are stationary in front of it (such as vocal recordings or radio broadcasts). This attribute COULD be used in a live sound setting to avoid feedback, but don't forget about that sensitivity, because even if it's off-axis, it WILL still pick up sounds from all around you. In ANY setting, I highly recommend a noise gate.

Being a condenser, the SC 400 is meant to be used at a slight distance away from the mouth. You don't want to eat this microphone, it will not do you any favors. Now, that said, I do personally keep it closer to my face, but I also keep it slightly off to the side so that the front of the diaphragm IS still pointed at my mouth, but the direct wind from my speech is passing over the TOP of the mic, not directly into it. This prevents plosives while still providing the proximity effect. In fact, I recommend that technique with ANY microphone. Old trick of the trade that seems to have been lost over the years.

Bottom line: just buy this microphone. You will not regret it.

This is a large diaphragm studio condenser microphone, albeit a small one. If you are used to using dynamic microphones for recording you will instantly notice the improvement - the crystal clarity that a large diaphragm condenser gives in comparison.
This is also a very cheap large diaphragm studio condenser microphone. In my experience, normally that cheapness would be reflected in the quality of the built-in pre-amp. I expected a relatively high noise floor - background hiss with the gain turned up to record quiet sources. I have to report it's not there.
According to the included specification sheet, this microphone has a better noise performance than my Audio Technica AT4033. It would be a complex process for me to actually measure if that is actually true, but in using the two side by side I have no reason to believe that the performance is worse.
I have used this mic to record vocals and acoustic guitar, both of which it does very well. It doesn't have a built-in pad, so I wouldn't use it for anything loud like horns. The low-cut switch is internal and requires unscrewing the body - but this is only required for close mic-ing, and these mics are best used with a bit of distance between source and mic (with a pop-screen for vocals).
The included shock mount is a necessity for this type of microphone, and the one supplied does the job quite adequately (considering you could spend the same money for just a shock mount on its own).
If you haven't yet recorded with a large diaphragm condenser, then get yourself one of these. Just remember though, the money you save on buying this (rather than a more expensive model) will have to be spent on acoustic screening once having a decent mic shows up how bad your room acoustics really are. But you'd have to do that if you spent more on a mic.

Overall a great sounding mic for the price. However, I experienced an issue with it. Sometimes I can hear this weird noise in my recording like someone is blowing into the mic very hard. I have a popfilter and keep the mic at the corner of my mouth so it can't be me.

Thomann told me that it's possible that this microphone can't keep up with the bitrate and high buffer size of my recording software.

I'm not sure that's actually the case or if my microphone is simply faulty, but Thomann has issued a full refund for me, so that's great! Great customer service on their part.

Overall, if it weren't for that issue, I'd give this mic a five star rating simply because it's a great bang for your buck.

A very nice, professional looking, entry level microphone. Bought it as a backup for the dynamic mic I've been using for podcasting and narration/voice-over.

What I found was that for its price - it doesn't feel that cheap. Sure it doesn't have many bells and whistles but it does the job.
It has a sturdy build unlike any in that price range, and the accessories (shock mount and bag) don't feel cheap either.
The sound is crisp and clean without touching the gain or adding any processing.
Sensitivity is very good to the point where I had to turn it down a bit to avoid clipping when I get overexcited, also be prepared to feel any and all reflections and reverberations in your acoustic environment.
Voice sounds vibrant, and though the proximity effect is nothing to write home about - it is there. My voice is a bit nasal but I can feel the slight differences as I adjust posture to minimize it - that's how clear it feels.
The only thing I don't like that much is the polar pattern. I tend to shuffle and I sometimes leave the sweet spot of the super-cardioid pattern and it shows in the end product. This shouldn't be a problem if you're mostly doing vocals or voice-over.

Overall it performs WAY better than expected and is perfect for a first condenser, for a backup when in a pinch, and for everyday studio work.

Pros:
* The price-quality is unmatched. See below.
* Build. At this price point it doesn't get better. It's sturdy and doesn't feel cheap like the chinese clones.
* Sound is clear and crisp.
* The baggie and shock mount are also good quality

Cons:
* If you move a lot while you record - the pattern is a a bit unforgiving. You need proper posture and positioning.
* It's QUITE sensitive to the point I had to turn the gain down to avoid clipping. Also it is a bit unforgiving if you have bad acoustics in the room/studio.

A few years ago I tried a 600EUR dynamic Shure at my friend’s studio and was underwhelmed with the outcome.
This experience stopped me from investing in an XLR mic and I just kept using my no-name USB one for „bedroom recordings”.
Found this one by a complete accident and could not believe the quality-price ratio. Did my research and finally got it just to be overwhelmed with the pure quality of this little thing.
I have a softer style of singing so condensed mic served me the best. Despite that condensed mics tend to pick up a lot of background noise, I did my trial recording while having AC and PC on + washing machine working in the next room. Still got a beautiful, rich, clean recording.

The price is unbelievable for such quality.

Well, this thing is pretty cheap. It comes with a shockmount and although it holds the mic in place by a springsteel plate wrapped around the mic, rather than by screwing it in and the mic is not fimly attached to the mount, it is pretty good and reliable.
The mic itself feels, well, cheap. The housing is all made out of thick metal and the mic has a nice weight to it, but you can just feel that it's like the cheapest steel that you can get. Also the emblazed text is smudgy and faded and the finish is not very nice. At this pricepoint though you'll hardly find anything more premium-looking i guess.
Soundwise it isn't too bad. . Oddly enough, i like to use the mic for recording slightly overdriven Marshall plexi sound, for some reason it sounds stunning with single coils. However, the higher frequencies are slightly distorted which is very annoying, when you try to record something clean and relatively high pitched (female voice). There is a possibility that my unit is damaged, when it arrived there was a pretty deep dent in the membrane cover (most likely already from the factory as the packaging itself was intact) but I couldn't be bothered to complain about it and the damage is probably just cosmetical. Either way, I'd classify it as "usable".
Generally speaking, I'm slightly underwhelmed by the mic. The price is pretty low, but it isn't dirt cheap. For less than twice as much you can get some great sounding MXL mics that will last you a long time, an SM57 or the Rode Nt1 (that I've used and liked much more). My expectations were high, all of the other Thomann's own brand products that I've bought were such a bargain, but I can't really say that about this mic.
My reccommendation to you if you want to buy your first mic is to stretch your budget a bit more and go for something more expensive that you might keep on using for a bit longer (MXL, Rode or perhaps the higher tier t-bones). Make it a worthwile investment.

Had al een Audio Technica 2035, maar wilde er nor eentje bij. En dat voor deze prijs!

Is echt goed. Net zoals de AT is het eerder een studio microfoon of voor thuisopnames, minder voor on stage (maar daarvoor heb ik mijn Sennheiser 865 S).

Sommigen zeiden me dat de SC 400 nogal wat ruis vertoonde, wel de mijne in ieder geval niet. Klank is gewoon uitstekend.

Puntje minder voor de afwerking van de spider, de schroef waarmee je hem op de mic stand in positie houdt is een metalen ding dat altijd los komt (en de micro gaat dan alle kanten uit). Wel op z'n minst krijg je de (voor de rest goede) spider er bij. Die van de AT is denk ik beter maar eens die op de 2035 hebt gezet krijg je hem er nooit meer af.

Al bij al goede aankoop.